railenthe: (Squee!)
railenthe ([personal profile] railenthe) wrote2013-04-12 11:28 pm
Entry tags:

100 Things #35: Sherlock(s)

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is a staple of classic reading. However, I will admit that until a year and a half ago, I hadn’t read a single Sherlock Holmes story. And this at the time where the BBC reboot was getting big, and I had a friend prodding me to watch.

Luckily, I had two things: A brand-new Nook Simple Reader, and the URL of Project Gutenberg. Basically all the classics are available, and so I pounced on it, reading as much of the canon as I could (though admittedly out of sequence).

I went in without expectations, but the ‘classics’ were well known (by my folks, who colored my expectations) as stuffy old things.

So when the first thing that happened was the science of antemortem bruise formation, I cracked up laughing. The series as a whole has a strange, sardonic wit to it. I dove headfirst into the thrillers then, enjoying the thing without the preconceived expectations of before.

If someone’s trying to sell you on any of the reboots, I’d totally read the originals first. …then again, I’m a purist.

glacialphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] glacialphoenix 2013-04-13 03:14 pm (UTC)(link)
*is also a Sherlock Holmes purist. But I think that's because I read Arthur Conan Doyle when I was like... oh, six or seven, and Sherlock Holmes was totally my childhood hero.

[identity profile] railenthe.livejournal.com 2013-04-13 03:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Considering he's one of the patron saints of snark, I'm not surprised.

"THE GAME IS AFOOT"

[identity profile] alkonost-storm.livejournal.com 2013-04-15 02:16 pm (UTC)(link)
The books ARE a lot of fun to read, though I've also enjoyed the new movies as well. It doesn't hurt that they're close to the books in some respects. ^^

[identity profile] railenthe.livejournal.com 2013-04-15 03:24 pm (UTC)(link)
And then there's this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0DlzX_JSaA&feature=youtube_gdata_player